The Highs and (Mostly) Lows of Shell’s Failed Arctic Adventure

After 10 years, $7 billion and a cavalcade of errors, Shell leaves a trail of mistakes as it abandons Arctic drilling

Share this article

On December 31, 2012, Shell's Kulluk drilling rig grounded on Sitkalidak Island. This was the latest in a series of mishaps plaguing the Arctic drilling expedition. (Credit: Petty Officer 2nd Class Zachary Painter, U.S. Coast Guard)

Share this article

In the 10 years between Royal Dutch Shell’s first purchase of a drilling rig destined for the Arctic and the company’s decision to close its Arctic oil and gas exploration program on Monday, it has sunk more than $7 billion into the program. A series of setbacks ranging from permit troubles to legal challenges to equipment failures to improper recordkeeping has littered its route along the way. The oil giant has also faced increasing pressure from environmental activists, local communities and business partners concerned about the associated climate impacts.

Ultimately, it was a combination of meager oil and gas reserves, regulatory uncertainty and high costs that blighted Shell’s Arctic ambitions. The company needed “a multi-billion barrel discovery” to “justify going ahead,” Shell chief executive Ben van Beurden said in an investor call last January. Instead, the Berger J well yielded reserves “not sufficient to warrant further exploration,” according to a company statement.

There were many highlights and lowlights of Shell’s tumultuous Arctic program, shown in the timeline below.

About This Story

Perhaps you noticed: This story, like all the news we publish, is free to read. That’s because Inside Climate News is a 501c3 nonprofit organization. We do not charge a subscription fee, lock our news behind a paywall, or clutter our website with ads. We make our news on climate and the environment freely available to you and anyone who wants it.

That’s not all. We also share our news for free with scores of other media organizations around the country. Many of them can’t afford to do environmental journalism of their own. We’ve built bureaus from coast to coast to report local stories, collaborate with local newsrooms and co-publish articles so that this vital work is shared as widely as possible.

Two of us launched ICN in 2007. Six years later we earned a Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting, and now we run the oldest and largest dedicated climate newsroom in the nation. We tell the story in all its complexity. We hold polluters accountable. We expose environmental injustice. We debunk misinformation. We scrutinize solutions and inspire action.

Donations from readers like you fund every aspect of what we do. If you don’t already, will you support our ongoing work, our reporting on the biggest crisis facing our planet, and help us reach even more readers in more places?

Please take a moment to make a tax-deductible donation. Every one of them makes a difference.

Thank you,

Share this article